Archive

Archive for the ‘Fashion’ Category

Buy of the day

September 3rd, 2010 Beauty Guide No comments

Kate Carter recommends a little something to brighten up every day of the week. Check back each day for the next suggestion

Friday


T-shirt, £18, from Asos.com

Everyone's favourite online fashion store Asos have teamed up with the London College of Fashion to design a one-off T-shirt for the Jeans for Genes charity. The result is this very stylish ribbon and chain print top by first year illustration student Elise Mary Yasmin Pellican: great name, great design. The charity itself supports children with genetic disorders, and all proceeds from the sale will go to it.

Thursday


Canvas and leather bag, £170, by Veja at Darkroom

Veja have branched out from lovely stylish simple trainers to bags - this range is exclusive to the rather fabulous Darkroom boutique on Lams Conduit Street (last non-homogenised street in Central London? Discuss). Using organic cotton, wild rubber, vegetable-tanned leather - the company's ethical credentials are impeccable. Expensive, yes, but highly durable and hey, it's never too early to start stocking up on Christmas presents. Particularly if they are for yourself.

Wednesday

Aesop exfoliating paste, £26, from beautyexpert.co.uk

If you've not yet discovered Australia's brilliant Aesop range, buy of the day highly recommends it. This exfoliator is gentle but thorough, and although the price may seem quite steep, a tube lasts an inordinately long time. The haircare range is also very high quality and again, a little goes a very long way.

Tuesday

Baby slippers, £30, by Camper

Growing up sucks. You have to go out, get a job, act responsibly, stop climbing all over the furniture and leaving your mucky handprints on the TV, you're not allowed to howl any more because someone stole your toy and you don't get to wear cute rabbit slippers. Not if you want to be thought of as in any way normal, anyway. Buy these for someone small and cute then, and relive your lost youth while feeling just a teeny bit jealous.

Monday

LCN nail varnish, £5.30, from beautyconcepts.co.uk

Buy of the day was recently horrified to learn that people actually queued - yes queued - for the latest 'must-have' Chanel nail polish, and that it changed hands (nails?) on eBay for a small fortune. Save yourself said fortune, then, and buy a nail varnish for just over a fiver that's brilliant quality and has more shades than a Dulux showroom. LCN's new range launches this September - our favourite shades are 'paparazzi' (the deep blue above) and 'dark room' (gothic black, Twilight DVD not included).


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Lauren Luke’s luscious lip gloss

August 27th, 2010 Beauty Guide No comments

Pucker up with these


Buy of the day

August 20th, 2010 Beauty Guide No comments

Kate Carter recommends a little something to brighten up every day of the week. Check back each day for the next suggestion

Friday

Blackberries, free, from a bramble patch near you

Today Buy of the Day would like to encourage you to go and help yourself to some delicious free fruit at a common/hedge/field/road near you. Mainly because we've now made jam, jelly, crumbles and pies and filled our freezer with the rest and, astonishingly, there are STILL lots left.

Thursday

Boots, £59, from toms-shoes.co.uk

Buy of the Day is now on its third pair of TOMS espadrilles. Not only are they incredibly comfortable, but for every pair you buy, the company gives a new pair to a child in need. This September TOMS is going to be placing its millionth pair in Argentina, where the idea for the company was born. The autumn range is also a step (ahem) forward for the company, featuring all sorts of cold weather styles, such as these lovely waxed cotton boots. This style is available for both men and women, though Buy of the Day does not suggest you adopt his'n'hers footwear.

Wednesday

Toning spritzer, £17, from Afriteaque

Everyone likes a nice cup of tea, but these days we don't just drink the stuff, we slap it on our skin, too, from Neal's Yard's white tea eye gel to Burt's Bees's soap. The latest type of tea to make it into a beauty range is rooibos, the caffeine-free South African plant. New brand Afriteaque (see what they did there?) makes a collection of skincare products featuring organic, fair trade rooibos grown by small-scale producers. We especially like the toning spritzer, which is great for freshening up on hot days.

Tuesday

Lunchboxes, £7.50, from Pinks & Green

These sweet melamine lunchboxes (there is also a pink version with a girl and her cat) are fair trade, dishwasher-proof and nigh on unbreakable. Brilliant, then, for kids, but why waste them on an undeserving audience? Buy one for your office lunch instead.

Monday

Biodegradable balloons, £1.95, from ethicalsuperstore.com

Your average party balloon probably biodegrades over the course of three millennia, so if you are planning a kid's party, try these rather more environmentally friendly options from Ethical Superstore.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

The updo is back

August 10th, 2010 Beauty Guide No comments

Buns and chignons are so much more elegant than long, tumbling hair. We welcome the return of grownup hairstyles

Long, bouncy, tumbling, just-had-a-blow-dry hair has for some years been to a certain type of woman what a gold Rolex has always been to a certain type of man: an instantly identifiable calling card of wealth and success. This is because – newsflash! – not many women are born with hair that grows skywards for an inch at the root, falls perfectly straight to the jaw, and then loops itself into demi-waves at the end. That kind of hair requires professional blow-drying, probably using expensive Japanese hair straighteners and quite possibly with extensions underneath.

Well, goodbye to all that, and welcome to a new era of kirby grips and dry shampoo. Girlish, loose hair is being edged out of the spotlight in favour of a new look: the grownup, serious updo. Mad Men's glamorous styles – and, in particular, Joan Holloway's siren-red updo – are this catwalk season's premier style reference. Chignons and buns, hitherto dismissed as the dowdy retirement-home options of a barnet past its prime, have made a resounding comeback. At the most recent Prada catwalk show in Milan, models in bosomy bustiers and below-the-knee full skirts were given scaled-up versions of severe-librarian-style updos. Giles Deacon gave his models an inflated, circular beehive with a soft, marshmallow texture; at Yves Saint Laurent, scraped-back hair was augmented with an enormous, chelsea bun sized twist on the back of the head.

Personally, as someone who has never had either the funds, time or inclination (never mind all three) to schedule weekly salon appointments and whose natural hair categorically does not bounce or tumble, I am more than happy to see the back of blow-dry tyranny. But this is not, it must be said, any kind of age of austerity. I was half-lying about the kirby grips. While it is perfectly possible, with practice, to do these styles yourself, it is not merely a matter of reviving old scrape, twist and spray techniques vaguely remembered from childhood ballet exams.

Jo Cree Browne, artistic director at Trevor Sorbie, points out that "the shape and the scale have to be exaggerated. That's what makes it cool, and not just granny hair." Flick through any of this month's glossy magazines, and take a look at the new Prada campaign, in which the models' heads are almost doubled in size thanks to their giant chignons. Luke Hersheson, the hairstylist responsible for many a hot cover look or catwalk trend, specifies that "the height and volume has to be at the back now. Height at the front, that looks old."

The bewitching aesthetic of Mad Men has introduced a new generation to the joys of pinning one's hair up. "There are different versions worn by different characters," points out Ian Florey, master stylist at Charles Worthington. "Christina Hendricks [who plays Joan] is a bit Audrey Hepburn in Breakfast at Tiffany's, and then January Jones [who plays Betty] is a bit more Bardot." And even before Mad Men hit our screens, Amy Winehouse had been subverting the traditional connotations of the beehive, and Kate Moss has been wearing her hair in a very simple bun for major events – receptions at Buckingham Palace, the British fashion awards – for at least six years.

Mad Men's popularity is also a symptom of our fascination with the look and feel of the late 1950s and early 1960s. Think of Julianne Moore in A Single Man, set in 1962, and the diva-ish, Liz Taylor proportions of her hairdo; or of Michelle Obama's Kennedy-era sartorial references. "The 1960s sexy, messy updo has been around for a while," says Hersheson. "What's new this season is that the look has gone back a few years. It's a bit more 1950s. It is a look that projects respectability, and seriousness." (This might be why Naomi Campbell chose it for her appearance at the Hague last week.) "It's for a girl who wants to look like a woman," says Hersheson.

But in an industry still obsessed with youth, can the updo survive the stigma of being associated with the not-so-young? In the film Up, Ellie Fredricksen, late wife of the curmudgeonly hero, is depicted with her hair in a neat, grey, bagel-sized bun, a cartoonish image of an old lady. Most of the hairstylists I spoke to said that the women experimenting with super-sized chignons were their younger clients.

Although dramatic, these styles are, says Cree Browne, "a more attainable look" than the Manhattan blow-out ideal. Last year's furore over Cheryl Cole advertising hair products while wearing extensions demonstrated how unrealistic our expectations of long hair had become. A chignon or a "cinnamon bun" – as they more poetically call the "doughnut" in America – may take some effort to achieve but once done it will last all day and evening.

"And I like that it's honest," says Hersheson. "It is blatantly not effortless, and I'm over that whole faux-effortless thing. This is grownup hair, and grownup attitude."

How to create the supersized chignon

You will need: volume spray, kirby grips, a net hair "doughnut" and hairspray.

1 Prep the hair with volume booster and dry upside-down.

2 Split the hair into two sections from ear to ear, and pin the front section out of the way.

3 Pull the back section into a high ponytail, backcomb the ponytail, then thread it through your net "doughnut" and twist around to make a high bun on the crown.

4 Divide the front section into three, comb the two side sections back, and flatten with lots of hairspray.

5 Take the last section of hair – a square on top of your head from your temples – and pull this over the bun at the crown, tucking it underneath. Pin and spray with hairspray.

Jo Cree Browne, artistic director at Trevor Sorbie


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Ad men today are wrong on body size

July 31st, 2010 Beauty Guide No comments

Why Lynne Featherstone was right to celebrate curvaceous Christina Hendricks as a role model

Pity those who are rubbishing the equalities minister Lynne Featherstone's efforts to influence the style industry with her comments that Christina Hendricks, voluptuous star of Mad Men, is an ideal female role model. They must be denying what they know about the body-issue problems affecting their mothers, daughters, sisters, aunts or friends. We can see an unconscious pull to dismiss the initiative by telling it as a story of the minister's personal prejudices, her own desire to see curvaceous bodies become the new visual musak.

Of course that wasn't Featherstone's point at all. She was relishing Hendricks as a refreshing counterpoint to the homogeneity of female body image that we have been receiving and transmitting and attempting to emulate for several decades. She wasn't arguing for a new form of body tyranny.

Enough studies have been carried out demonstrating the harm done to all girls and women – including those for whom that body shape comes naturally – and the harm that is now enveloping boys and men, by the almost unremitting parade of skinniness. This public health emergency is hidden from view by media trivialisation of the problem and by attributing its causes to vanity. The insistence that the commercialisation of the body is a fit subject for political discussion and intervention is well overdue.

Skinny is only one body type. But it has been the aesthetic, with modifications in height (now tall with long legs: used to be middling with shapely ones) and breast size (now big: used to be small) for several decades. It's not that there is anything wrong with skinniness in its current manifestation: it's the singularity of the image, and the message, which makes us judge anything that deviates from it as somehow wrong.

If the aesthetic changed tomorrow and the estimated 5,000 to 10,000 images (not to mention the uncountable number on the internet) we see weekly of thin bodies were suddenly to change to – skilfully lit, photo-manipulated and artistically displayed – curvy bodies, the desire to conform to that new model could produce the same kind of anguish as today's singular skinny aesthetic does. We'd be back to Wate-On tablets at the chemist and people feeling inadequate about how thin they were.

We want to see the influence of visual culture on us as trivial, as a silliness, as something that only affects people if they have an emotional disposition (read weakness) towards it, or have a gene that disposes them to it. But it isn't trivial, it isn't about weakness and it isn't about genetics. It can be deadly. It can consume a life. It can be a hidden horror starting at six and going on until old age. And, perhaps most disturbingly, most body image problems don't show. They aren't about anorexia or obesity. They are an obsession endured.

The attempt to bring the style industries together to create a wider aesthetic, which can embrace different body types while remaining edgy and modish, is an important challenge. And it is time we took it seriously.

We need to take steps to change our visual landscape to show variety in size and shape and ethnicity and – as the Guardian has begun to do in its Weekend magazine fashion spread – age. I often feel sorry for all those talented art directors who are endlessly turning the raw photos of models into facsimile copies. It would surely be so much more stimulating for them to fashion an aesthetic which is actually modern, does no harm and restores the variety of reality back to their artifice.

Featherstone has been caricatured as clunky for her intervention, but in truth there isn't a person reading this piece who doesn't know someone who is suffering because body hatred has eaten into their sense of self. This relatively new phenomenon is fed by industries which grow fat on inducing feelings of body insecurity. Few feel good and safe in their bodies. Not even, it turns out, those who happen to meet the current beauty standards. Body hatred is a modern virus undermining so many. The fashion industries who inadvertently cause considerable pain to girls and women could reformulate their stance so that they became part of what makes living in our bodies enjoyable rather than a target for beauty terror.

Eighty-eight per cent of spending on clothes is in sizes and prices that never see the catwalk or the glossies. Wouldn't it be great to see a representative of that ordinary percentage glamorised in our magazines? Wouldn't it be great if young girls had a variety of physical shapes and activities with which to identify? Wouldn't it be great if we weren't exporting body hatred around the world by implying that the bodies on our billboards are the only ones that let you engage with the modern world? Wouldn't it be great if we taught our kids body confidence rather than body fear, so that they knew when they were hungry, knew when they were tired and enjoyed the pleasure of running around and doing sport not because it would burn off the calories but because they enjoyed being active? Wouldn't it be great if expectant mums could go to term without having photographs of celebrities, who had early caesareans to avoid the last weeks of "fat", paraded in front of them? Wouldn't it be great if new mums could get to know their babies and their own bodies' appetites rather than feel pressure to get back to their pre-pregnancy body in six weeks? Wouldn't it be great for children to absorb contented and non-anxious bodies, and go on themselves to enjoy bodies they didn't feel impelled to change and discipline for life?

The acceptance of body hatred and body difficulties is what we need to take on. The way in which the media has become a handmaiden to the diet and beauty industries, whose nefarious practices yield great profits for them and great pain for us and our daughters (and our sons), is shameful. It is easier to attack Featherstone than admit the damage that we know is around us. Because we live inside the problem and manage it individually, it doesn't mean there isn't a solution. There is. Talking to those industries who could bring about positive change is a start. It's not meddling, boring or worthy. It is interesting, challenging, and especially for those art directors, exciting.

Susie Orbach is convenor of any-body.org and author of Bodies (Profile Books)


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Laren Luke’s false eylashes

July 30th, 2010 Beauty Guide No comments

Worth a flutter?


Buy of the day

July 30th, 2010 Beauty Guide No comments

Kate Carter recommends a little something to brighten up every day of the week. Check back each day for the next suggestion

Friday

A-Z bookends, £7.75, by Graham and Green

These gorgeous bookends will keep your battered paperbacks in check, and lend a touch of literary élan to any humble collection of bonkbusters, thrillers and chick lit. They're available in slate grey or black, measure 18cm by 12cm, and are satisfyingly weighty. But the best thing about them is the price: they have been reduced from £24.95 to £7.75 in the Graham and Green summer sale. And is Buy of the Day bitter about paying full price for them at Christmas? Not at all. Not at all [grits teeth].

Thursday

Rabbit child's comforter, £12.99, by Sleepytots

This sweet little rabbit may just help you get a good night's sleep. His velcro paws can hold on to a comforter, car seat or pushchair, and will therefore be hard for even a toddler to lose. At night they can use his soft little body as a pillow. He is also - and essentially - machine washable, and Buy of the Day can testify that he comes out just as soft from the washing machine.

Wednesday

Holua headphones, £58.60, by Skullcandy, available at amazon.co.uk

These stylish little beauties are the only headphones in the world to be made of wood, and they come in a hemp pouch, so bonus eco points there. Yes, the sound quality is impressive, but hey, when they look this good, you'll be posing in them, not listening to them, right? They also come in a huge range of styles, finishes and prices, so have a proper browse.

Tuesday

Cotton bath towels, £19, by hammamas.com

These lovely coloured bath towels are based on traditional Turkish designs. They are extremely lightweight and dry very fast, and have the huge holiday-packing advantage of disappearing to almost nothing when folded. Not only that, but they double up as, well, almost anything. Sarong, tablecloth, baby wrap, rug ... They are 100% cotton and handmade on traditional Turkish looms.

Monday

Bikini top, £22, and tie-side briefs, £16, by Lepel at Figleaves.com

Polka dots are very in - and nods in the direction of Minnie Mouse's dress sense can only be a good thing, no? Look good on the beach with Lepel: mouse ears optional.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Key fashion trends of the season: Pastel makeup

July 26th, 2010 Beauty Guide No comments

Check out the designer look, then shop for it on the high street


Madonna, Demi and other women I’d like to show their age

July 24th, 2010 Beauty Guide No comments

The use of older women as models is all very well – except they don't look like older women at all

It seems that older women are being celebrated by our society at last – or so we're being told. A raft of recent stories have assured women that it is no longer the case that they become invisible once they reach middle age. Take Madonna (we always take Madonna in these matters), who at the age of 51 has just signed to a high-profile campaign with Dolce & Gabbana. Or Sharon Stone, at 52 the face of Dior cosmetics. Or Elle MacPherson, 47, who recently made her first catwalk appearance in 20 years for Marc Jacobs's Louis Vuitton collection (named after that feminist masterpiece And God Created Woman). Jacobs also made news by casting Laetitia Casta – at 32, considered superannuated for a supermodel. And after Twiggy's success modelling for Marks & Spencer, Yasmin le Bon was quoted saying that models are lying about their ages to get more work – by pretending to be older.

Designers and fashion bloggers are enthusing that we've come of age. After years of double-standards in which the likes of Cary Grant and Sean Connery remained leading men into their 70s, while women over 40 were consigned to oblivion, beautiful women of (a certain) age are suddenly returning to prominence. So 72-year-old Jane Fonda fronts a campaign for L'Oréal skin creams targeted at older women, while the autumn/winter catwalks featured "older" women galore, including Calvin Klein's show, which hired models at the ripe old ages of 39 and 43, and British Vogue, which recently featured a positively ancient 36-year-old model. Meanwhile, Macpherson is also starring, along with male judges including designer Julien Macdonald, in a refashioned series of Britain's Next Top Model, teaching ambitious young women the revolutionary lesson that their looks will be the route to wealth and success. (Now that the double-standard has ended, I'm looking forward to Britain's Next Top Male Model – judged by Naomi Campbell.)

After years of telling ourselves that we're worth it, is society finally agreeing? It does seem to be the case that the fashion industry is finally recognising how many of its consumers are wealthy older women and that it might be wise to consider representing them. It is also true that the fashion industry enjoys shocking itself, and few things could be more shocking than admitting that older women – or even undeniably old women, as in the case of 81-year-old model Daphne Selfe, recently featured by Sykes London – might be beautiful, and marketable.

But before we pop open the champagne, let's consider the obvious. The fact is that all of these women look at least 20 to 30 years younger than they are – especially in photographs. In Dior's Sharon Stone campaign, she looks gorgeous, to be sure – but she also looks rather like a Japanese anime drawing of herself 30 years ago. The "photographs" are so airbrushed they're more like paintings: there's not a wrinkle to be seen, not a whisper of a laughter line or a crow's foot, and certainly not a grey hair. Sean Connery wasn't just grey, he was bald when he romanced Catherine Zeta Jones in Entrapment 10 years ago: and he was still seen as sexy. If Stone had grey (or thinning!) hair and were fronting Dior, it might resemble an evolution in our attitudes toward older women – if not a revolution. But I'd settle for a wrinkle, a crease, a single sign of a life well-lived, as evidence that we now find older women attractive. The vast majority of the time we don't: we just demand that they look like younger women.

Like Madonna. The new Dolce & Gabbana campaign features pictures as egregiously airbrushed as the Stone Dior ads: Madonna, looking preposterously beautiful, is walking with a young man in his 20s, and she looks not a day older. How, if our images of older women look exactly like our images of younger women, does this represent progress? Moreover, I'm going to go out on a limb and guess – this is sheer speculation, obviously – that it's just possible that Madonna, Sharon, Elle, et al might possibly, maybe, have had the teensiest bit of cosmetic surgery. Not to mention their extreme diet and exercise regimens. This is all symptomatic of our more general cultural obsession with youth: male movie stars are, by and large, subject to similar pressures regarding their bodies, but it remains the case that women are far more so.

Meanwhile, the idea that older women might actually marry, let alone date, younger men remains so shocking that it is not only newsworthy, it's earned its own nickname, and a sitcom – Cougar Town – with Courtney Cox. Women dating younger men require a predatory nickname, which has quickly evolved into a taxonomy (cougars, pumas, or the more comical milfs); but men dating younger women are just called men. Thus Madonna continues to make headlines every time she goes out with a younger man, while her ex-husband Guy Ritchie, 41, can date a 28-year-old without anyone batting an eyelid. Sam Taylor-Wood's engagement to a 19-year-old caused shockwaves last year. The most famous cougar is Demi Moore, who's cheerfully admitted to having had a complete surgical overhaul so that she looks half her age, and can marry someone who is. The point is that the "older" ages of Madonna and Moore are little more than a technicality as long as they look 30, and are rich enough to maintain the illusion for a while longer.

Far from these older women heralding a step forward, they are setting the bar impossibly high for the rest of us, who will seem all the more aged when our real wrinkles show. None of this represents an evolution in attitude, in which the signs of age on women have become more attractive: on the contrary, it's selling women an entire industry geared at erasing those signs. The logical next step is to blame real women for failing to live up to the unreasonable standards being set: if Sharon Stone looks that good at 52, why don't you? Ideally, we should try reconciling ourselves to ageing in general; but failing that, if we're going to be obsessed with youth we need at least to abolish the double-standard.

That said, there's also no need to be pious about it: our cultural youth-fetish may be shallow, but it is also a straightforward defence mechanism against intimations of our own mortality. It would be hypocritical to pretend anyone looks forward to ageing, or wants to look, feel or be old. I'm not above colouring any grey hairs that might one day (a long, long, long time from now) appear.

But it is at the very least worth pointing out the cognitive dissonance at work here. Call it false consciousness, denial, or just dishonesty: these images of older women frozen in time implicitly reinforce Oscar Wilde's dictum that when one loses one's good looks, one loses everything. Like modern pictures of Dorian Gray, these images are there to help us hide some rather ugly truths from ourselves.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Some shoes might look ugly – but are they good for your feet?

July 22nd, 2010 Beauty Guide No comments

Podiatrist Beverley Ashdown gives her verdict on five ugly but practical shoes that have become fashionable.